Skip to main content
Client confidentiality· by default

No logos. On purpose.

You probably clicked this page looking for a customer list, a case study, or a wall of logos. There isn't one — and below is the reasoning, stated plainly. Confidentiality is part of what the service is, not a gap in the marketing.

Four reasons · what stands in their place

01 · Why the page is bare

Four reasons, from most to least structural.

None of these are posture. Each one is a consequence of what the service actually does — and what we refuse to ask clients to trade for our marketing.

01

The numbers we return are private by construction.

Lift is measured against the store's pre-install baseline — the monthly revenue the store already makes. That baseline is the single most sensitive figure in any engagement. Publishing a case study publishes that figure to competitors, to paid-media opponents, to anyone scraping the brand name. The default is that the number stays with the owner it belongs to.

02

Ad-platform performance data has sharing constraints.

Attribution metrics, match-quality scores, and platform-reported performance figures are governed by each ad platform's merchant agreement. Publishing them in case-study form touches rules most merchants shouldn't want their name attached to. We decline to ask any client to opt into that on our behalf.

03

Logos become leverage we don't need.

A recognizable brand logo provides free credibility in exchange for referenced use of the brand. Loomaru charges a flat, revenue-band fee instead of trading on the reputations of the stores it serves. If a logo ever appears on this site, it will be because the merchant asked — not because we did.

04

The commitments stand alone.

The 30-day unconditional money-back, the 99.9% uptime commitment, the 24-hour data purge on cancellation — these are contractual, not case-study-contingent. The right way to evaluate a service like this is to pilot it against the store's own sales report for thirty days. That is a harder proof than a screenshot.

02 · What stands in its place

A harder proof than a screenshot.

A case study is one-way communication. These four are bidirectional — and survive the procurement review.

  1. 01

    A pilot against your own baseline.

    Every engagement measures lift the same way: the merchant's own admin-side sales report for the 30 days before install, against the same window after. The comparison is your store against itself — not against an anonymous 'fellow merchant' from a marketing deck.

  2. 02

    A reference conversation, where appropriate.

    On request, and only with clients who have explicitly consented, we connect you to an existing merchant for a direct conversation. No press-release framing, no marketing middle layer. The conversation happens in private; our name is not the subject.

  3. 03

    Contractual commitments you can read in full.

    The DPA (Terms §4), the CCPA Service Provider Addendum (Terms §5), the uptime commitment (§Service Level), the 30-day refund (§Refunds), the retention and deletion rules (Privacy §7). Legal reviews these and signs off; they are what actually gates the decision for most procurement teams.

  4. 04

    A public operating log.

    In place of curated case studies, the /log page records what shipped, what broke, and what was learned — chronologically, without revision. A small service's track record is the entries it accumulates over time.

If you still want to talk to someone —

Book the call.
Bring the questions this page didn't answer.

Where appropriate, a reference conversation can be arranged during the engagement — on request, and only with clients who have consented to one. Written questions go to vadim@loomaru.com.